Paul Prescod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Will Perl 6 use a bit, a byte or an integer to represent boolean > values? Will Perl programmers (not implementors) care? Probably only > if the use "pack" (which of course has Unicode equivalents)! Not even then. The only time you should care about representation is in packed strings, which can easily be said to be their own type. The rest of the time, you care about what the data is and not what it looks like. IYSWIM... Donal. -- Donal K. Fellows, Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, UK. (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44-161-275-6137 (preferred email addr.) (home) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44-1274-401017 Mobile: +44-7957-298955 http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~fellowsd/ (Don't quote my .sig; I've seen it before!)
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? David Cantrell
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Andrei Zmievski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Jeremy Hylton
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Nathan Torkington
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? raptor
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Yukihiro Matsumoto
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? John Wiersba
