W dniu 2012-11-19 18:35, Daniel Naber pisze:
> On 19.11.2012, 10:39:33 Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
>
>> Yeah, but to reuse the pattern, we would have to build a finite-state
>> machine in memory (or on disk) first. This is far from trivial because
>> we would have to flatly encode all features (token, pos, lemma) and make
>> sure we still have Java Unicode regular expressions.
>
> This has been mentioned before, but I'll just mention it again, in the hope
> that somebody might want to take a closer look:
>
> It might well be that everything our syntax can express can also be
> expressed with Jape:
>
> http://gate.ac.uk/sale/tao/splitch8.html#chap:jape
>
> They compile their grammar into a FSM, and they have no restrictions on the
> right hand side, i.e. you can use Java to handle your match. It might be
> possible to create Jape rules on-the-fly from our XML syntax.

Now the obvious question is: Is JAPE really faster? Last time I tried 
GATE, it was sluggish.

Regards,
Marcin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
Languagetool-devel mailing list
Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel

Reply via email to