On 2013-08-13 11:17, Daniel Naber wrote: > The only drawback I see is that matching will probably become slower.
A use case where performance is important is checking the Wikipedia dumps, as we do on our server. Actually we're checking only a tiny part of them, because it takes so long. Anyway, from a different point of view LT is really fast: checking takes 4 milliseconds per sentence on my machine for English text, and German is similar. I added a small test for this that you can start with any plain text file: org.languagetool.rules.patterns.PerformanceTest (in languagetool-standalone) The output for me was: Text length: 27562 chars, 271 sentences Warmup... Check time on first run: 2370ms = 8.7ms per sentence Checking text... Check time after warmup: 1292ms = 4.8ms per sentence Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
