I just realised that this is also already on http://wiki.languagetool.org/missing-features
I see lots of stuff to work on. I think we need to get more people in. So, in the past few days I've been advertising LT on forums and writing to language website developers about it. Hook them on LT and let the interest grow. Stefan Lotties wrote thus at 04:22 PM 13-09-13: >+1 for this proposal. It would be good to be able to add new rules and >override existing ones for fixing them on 'user-side' or in projects. >The latter case is a special one and will most likely not be used very >often, but it's still good to be able to do so. > >On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Kumara Bhikkhu ><[email protected]> wrote: > > Presently, LT has only one grammar.xml for each language. When a user > > adds rules in it for his own use (as it may not be accepted into the > > "official" grammar.xml), it would be overwritten when a new version > > is installed, right? > > > > So, I'd like to propose a provision for a user-grammar.xml. LT then > > is suppose to read both files. > > > > kb ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT 3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
