On 2014-01-02 14:26, Marcin Miłkowski wrote: > I did look at them again and it turns out that most only slowed down > the > process but did not help in creating good suggestions as short > fragments > were not put together the way they should.
As your changes have become quite complex now, I'd suggest to release 2.4.1 without those, i.e. with only the shortened list of pairs for en-US. Is that okay? Can I use the current version of the pairs file or does that depend on your code changes? Regards Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
