On 4 April 2014 18:29, Andriy Rysin <ary...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well moving the rules to common file will defeat the purpose of the
> split, especially when more and more rules will use unification...

Similar scenario, I create a temp common file, validate with that
then rm the temp file?
  Suites both uses?

HTH DaveP


>
> I looked in the code a bit more and it looks that we disable
> validation when we load rules in LT, that's why loading in run-time is
> working fine, and then I guess Java references the unifications that
> are already loaded.
>
> I'll keep looking for good solution,
> Andriy
>
>
> 2014-04-03 12:23 GMT-04:00 Daniel Naber <daniel.na...@languagetool.org>:
>> On 2014-04-03 01:12, Andriy Rysin wrote:
>>
>>> I guess we have two ways to go from here: adjust the tests to load
>>> files
>>> and keep them (I am not sure how easy it is - depends on how flexible
>>> our XMLValidator is)
>>
>> We're just using standard XML validation, I don't think there's much we
>> can do (other than catching that specific exception, which would be very
>> ugly). But not many rules are affected, what about moving those to
>> grammar.xml? (I know, that's not very elegant either).
>>
>> Regards
>>   Daniel
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Languagetool-devel mailing list
>> Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Languagetool-devel mailing list
> Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel



-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Languagetool-devel mailing list
Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel

Reply via email to