On 2014-06-12 11:37, Daniel Naber wrote: > Having a frequency lookup that requires less RAM but is at least not > slow would be nice. Next thing I'd try is a Lucene index.
My progress has been a little slow on this issue, but I documented my findings here: http://wiki.languagetool.org/finding-errors-using-big-data In a nutshell, a Lucene index seems to work if hosted on a SSD (but I only tested 2gram so far). Regards Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
