W dniu 2014-08-18 04:11, Andriy Rysin pisze: > On 08/16/2014 06:07 PM, Daniel Naber wrote: >> On 2014-08-11 01:47, Andriy Rysin wrote: >> >>> I was writing a rule were I had to catch a phrase with last word being >>> noun, but only if that noun is not part of adverb chunk (with another >>> word following). The best way to do that seems to use adverb chunk in >>> exception but looks like this is not supported. >> Sorry for the late reply. If by chunks you mean phrases (and not chunks >> in the sense that the Language class has getChunker() implemented): the >> reason that they are not supported is probably that adding support might >> be difficult. The matching algorithm is already complicated. >> >> Note that you can use <antipattern> to specify patterns that prevent >> matching. These match on the whole sentence, though, not at a specific >> token. >> > No, I actually mean chunker (if I understand the concept correctly), I > have some adverb chunks defined in multiwords and it would be nice to be > abel to use them in exceptions and not just in tokens. > E.g. «показати тією мірою» have <adv> chunk marker on тією and </adv> on > мірою (besides their POS tags) so I would like to be able to use those. > And I would like to stick to localized scope so using antipattern is not > the best approach here.
To have chunks, you'd have to add a separate interface for the chunker. The <adv> tags you mention are *not* chunker tags, these are simple POS tags and you can use them in exceptions as POS tags. Hope that helps. Best, Marcin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
