THanks, I will check it out. The rule is not functioning very well at all. I commented it out and put it on the list of items to do.
Ruud > R.J. Baars <r.j.ba...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > >> I discovered that the rule below is not working very well. >> It look like 'skip' also skips over sentence boundaries. >> >> Is that intentional? Or is something else wrong? >> In case it is intentional, is there an option to forbid that? >> >> Ruud >> >> <rule id="nr738" name="duur kost"> >> <pattern> >> <token skip="4">duur</token> >> <token>kost</token> >> </pattern> >> <message>U bedoelt <suggestion>is duur</suggestion> of <suggestion>kost >> veel</suggestion>.</message> >> <short>Is duur, kost veel</short> >> <example type="incorrect">Weet je niet hoe <marker>duur die auto wel >> niet >> kost</marker>?</example> >> <example type="correct">Weet je niet hoe <marker>duur die auto wel niet >> is</marker>?</example> >> </rule> > > > Hi Ruud, > > You can run with the -v option (for verbose) to see what's > going on. It should then show each sentence separately, the > tokenization, the POS tags, the lemma, which unification rules > match etc. > > Skip should not span multiple sentences. > In my experience, skip="..." with a large numbers (or > worse with -1) can easily produces false positives. > > Regards > Dominique > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Languagetool-devel mailing list > Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
