On 2014-09-12 21:18, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote: > Another option. Use distance=1 and add replacement pairs (n nn, nn n, > t tt, tt t). > > I made optimizations in the morfologik speller specifically for this > use. What happens with performance?
Indeed, that works without decreasing performance. But in the meanwhile I found other common misspellings that we provided no suggestion for, so I have implemented the fallback approach (use edit dist=2 only if edit dist=1 doesn't return anything) for now: garentee greatful hipocrit mischevious hygeine rythem vacume vehical Regards Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
