Jaume, thanks, but I am not sure.
Depends on its implementation I think.
Where can I find more info?
Ruud
Op 16-09-14 om 12:26 schreef Jaume Ortolà i Font:
2014-09-16 11:21 GMT+02:00 R.J. Baars <r.j.ba...@xs4all.nl
<mailto:r.j.ba...@xs4all.nl>>:
We don't agree. There is a spellchecker, but also a single word ignore
list for it.
There are XML rules, but also a Simplereplace rule, a compounding
rule.
So apart from the hammer and the screwdriver, there are more tools.
There is indeed another tool for multi-words. It seems that Ruud
doesn't know it.
We can enable a HybridDisambiguator and add a MultiwordChunker to the
disambiguation. With this you can write a list of "multi-words" with
its corresponding tag in a plain text file (multiwords.txt).
I use the MultiwordChunker with two objectives: improve disambiguation
and avoid spelling matches in multiwords.
Would it be useful for you, Ruud?
Regards,
Jaume
But anyway, adding the most frequent ones tot the disambiguator works.
Getting rid of wrong postags and 10% reported possible spelling
errors on
the entire corpus is a higher priority.
And fixing false positives. Having almost doubled the amount or
rules is
enough for this month.
Ruud
> W dniu 2014-09-16 o 09:03, R.J. Baars pisze:
>> A word like 'Aviv'is not correct unless 'Tel' is before it.
>> So it is best to leave Tel and Aviv out of the spell checker.
>> That results in spell checking reporting errors for Aviv.
>>
>> In the disambiguator, there is the option to block that, by
making an
>> immunizing rule:
>>
>> <!-- Tel Aviv-->
>> <rule id="TEL_AVIV" name="Tel Aviv">
>> <pattern>
>> <token>Tel</token>
>> <token>Aviv</token>
>> </pattern>
>> <disambig action="ignore_spelling"/>
>> </rule>
>>
>> That works perfectly. But then, there are a lot of these word
>> combinations. Wouldn't it be better to have a multi-word ignore
list for
>> the spell checker?
>>
>> (Or even a multi-word spell checker, not just knowing 'correct'
and 'not
>> in list', but 'correct', 'incorrect' and 'not in list')
>
> It would not be an enhancement, as this would not give new
functionality
> but cripple the existing one. Also, the ability to use all XML
syntax is
> extremely important to me (I use POS tags and regular
expressions), so I
> wouldn't make use of the multi-word spell checker anyway. So
we'd have
> to introduce a crippled syntax that would look a little bit
different
> for a human being but with no meaningful functional change. I don't
> think it's worth our time.
>
> The spell checker is best for checking individual words. Just like a
> hammer, it's good for nails, and not for screws. For screws, we
have a
> screwdriver. For multi-word entities, we have more refined
tools, like
> tagging and disambiguation and special attributes.
>
> Best,
> Marcin
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
>
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Languagetool-devel mailing list
> Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Languagetool-devel mailing list
Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Languagetool-devel mailing list
Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Languagetool-devel mailing list
Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
