I'd like to bring attention to a problem with one of the English
disambiguation rules:
Incorrect: *They are laugh loudly.*
Correct: *They are laughing loudly.*
here the writer may have intended to write *laughing*, however the word
'laugh' is being understood only as 'NN', as shown from the log from a text
analysis:
*was_is_VB_NN:1
laugh[laugh/NN,laugh/VB,laugh/VBP,B-NP-singular|E-NP-singular] ->*
*laugh[laugh/NN,B-NP-singular|E-NP-singular]*
this means that we cannot detect this using a VB POS tag in a pattern rule
such as:
*<pattern>*
* <token regexp="yes">is|are|be</token>*
*<token postag="VBP"/>*
*<token postag="RB"/>*
*</pattern>*
Would it be possible for someone to adjust this rule so the verb retains
the VBP POS tag.
Thanks,
Jon.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho
_______________________________________________
Languagetool-devel mailing list
Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
