On 2014-12-12 18:24, Elie Naulleau wrote: Hi,
additionally to Marcin's reply, I'd like to add one aspect: > - Is it easly extensible ? (rule templates for new form of error > recognition, complex syntactic patterns that would require their own > implementation) there are basically three levels to write rules: -Without programming, using the grammar.xml and disambiguation.xml files. These offer some power but the files' syntax cannot be extended in a modular way. -If this isn't powerful enough, you can add XML rules in grammar.xml that match too many cases and then filter those matches with Java code (RuleFilter, see http://wiki.languagetool.org/development-overview#toc17) -If that still isn't powerful enough, you can write your own Java rules. There's no restriction on what Java rules can do, you have full access to the text and its analysis and you can run your own analysis. Regards Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
