On 2015-10-14 06:37, Dominique Pellé wrote: > I can see that sometimes, it's OK to treat nbsp as a whitespace, > but here, it's not since the goal of the rule is precisely to check > for > nbsp (either U+00A0 or U+202F). I'm not sure how to fix it. Maybe > we need an API to return the kind of white space?
We know the previous token and can check it directly, I've committed a fix for that. > false positives before, unless perhaps the text that we > check has changed? No, the regression texts are static. > understand why. There is not enough context > to understand the errors. The texts are from Wikipedia, you can often Google for the small snippet and will find the sentence (although it might have been changed in the meantime). Regards Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
