On 2015-10-25 14:44, Juan Martorell wrote: > I guess so. However, since I was not directly involved in Hunspell > integration into LT I want to make sure that the upgrade introduces no > regression. Besides, the extension of the dictionary in LO and in LT > do not match -- I think that needs a little more preparation.
Do you mean *.dic vs. *.dict? That's because we don't use the original plain text hunspell dictionaries, but we export them (usually via 'unmunch') and then compress them to a binary format. > afterwards. Personally, I find quite difficult allocating enough > continuous time to do something that is worth it. In its current state > I think it is not possible to pick thirty minutes here and forty five > there to contribute with something meaningful, at least for Spanish. I don't experience this problem for German, where I can still add rules without introducing many false alarms. If Spanish has a lot of homophones, like English, I also suggest having a look at http://wiki.languagetool.org/finding-errors-using-n-gram-data for easily adding "rules" (i.e. pairs of words). Regards Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
