Yes, the rule would be useful. Aside. The rule I_MOVING finds some related problems: Finds: I as walking. Finds: I as eating. Does not find: He as smiling. Does not find: I as calling.
The disambiguator log shows that for the 2 sentences that I_MOVING does not find, the disambiguator uses rule AS_NOT_ADVERB[1], which correctly removes the reading RB from 'as'. I would like to refine the rule AS_NOT_ADVERB to remove the reading RB from 'as' in the first 2 sentences. (But, I don't have the time to look at the problem now.) Regards, Mike Unwalla Contact: www.techscribe.co.uk/techw/contact.htm -----Original Message----- From: Marco A.G.Pinto [mailto:marcoagpi...@mail.telepac.pt] Sent: 17 August 2016 00:45 To: Mailing List - LanguageTool Subject: Possible English rule Hello! I typed this on IRC hours ago: [22:13] <marcoagpinto> just to tell you: before leaving to bed I found out an error in my course project... I as calling a function using -F instead of +F We could add a rule: I + AS + VERBGERUND -> I + WAS + VERBGERUND Is it a good rule? Thanks! Kind regards, >Marco A.G.Pinto ----------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
