Renee Danson wrote: > ... > Regarding the problem Matthew reported (link down following the error > report from ieee80211_crypto_enmic), it sounds like Quaker had some > possibilities to investigate. In particular, there's the CR that he > mentioned, 6698754, which is still open. > Yes, I think it's a similar problem of CR6698754, and actually, the failure of ieee80211_crypto_enmic() is caused by the packet error of iwk driver.
Matthew, could you please use attached dtrace script to get more information for me, then I can help to dig into it. Thanks, -- Quaker > There were also several bugs fixed in the iwk driver in nevada build > 87; Matthew was running build 90, but your tests were against builds > 81 and 86, and would not have included those fixes. > > I also have a question for Matthew: > > >>> Kaiwai Gardiner wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 10:07 +0800, Fu, Zhonghui wrote: >>>> >>>>> Kaiwai Gardiner, >>>>> >>>>> Have you used other wireless cards in addition to 4965? Is there the >>>>> same phenomena as 4965 on them? >>>>> Could you please give out your operation steps in detail? >>>>> >>>> No, unfortunately not. I only have this one laptop. I do have a >>>> athereos one in my bedroom in a desktop and it doesn't display the >>>> same rate of dropping out - and dladm states that the reception is >>>> poor. Soomething is going wrong when a poor signal is maintaining a >>>> conneciton whilst this laptop classes the signal as excellent - the >>>> reception keeps falling out of the sky. >>>> > > I'm a little confused about the signal levels. Which device reports the > poor signal strength: the atheros or the iwk? > > Thanks, > renee > _______________________________________________ > laptop-discuss mailing list > laptop-discuss at opensolaris.org > -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ieee80211_newstate.d URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/laptop-discuss/attachments/20080529/3bb946c8/attachment.ksh>
