On Jan 24, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Felix Klock wrote:
On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:45 AM, Felix Klock wrote:
"time (ms)" "time (ms)"
DUMP NONDUMP
...
lattice 2208
...
Oh, I forgot to mention: the reason that there was only one number
in the lattice row is that dumping the heap after loading the lattice
benchmark caused the Larceny runtime to segfault. So, um, "caveat
emptor."
-Felix
_______________________________________________
Larceny-users mailing list
Larceny-users@lists.ccs.neu.edu
https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
