Does anyone use the 1-argument record-mutator procedure that's present in the top-level environment of Larceny v0.93?
The reason I'm asking is that I have discovered, to my vast amazement, that Larceny's traditional record system can coexist with the draft R6RS record system, albeit with some overloading of procedures and the concomitant degradation of error checking. I could overload the record-mutator procedure if someone is using it and doesn't want to convert, but I'd prefer to replace it with the draft R6RS 2-argument record-mutator procedure. Will _______________________________________________ Larceny-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
