I really need to learn to hit 'reply to all'...
On Jan 8, 2008 4:45 PM, Ray Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 11:32 +0000, David Rush wrote:
>
> > There was also no change in behavior when I changed the
> > sockaddr_un.sun_family field to be socket/AF_LOCAL in the Larceny
> > code. So unfortunately, I do not think this is really the problem in
> > this code.
>
> Another shot in the dark...
>
> FCGI_LISTENSOCK_FILENO from a google search appears to be defined to be
> 0 (stdin). I'm wondering if Larceny's REPL is interfering with your
> socket reading from stdin.
That's more or less why I asked, although the actual read is in
theory happening from FD 4. It's just the accept that comes in on fd
0. The thing of it is that it should really all be bypassing the
runtime since I drop directly down to read().
I feel like I'm chasing my tail again. Perhaps it's time to instrument
the run-time.
david
--
Once you label me, you negate me
- Soren Kierkegaard
--
Once you label me, you negate me
- Soren Kierkegaard
_______________________________________________
Larceny-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
