David Rush wrote:
> The transcript below says it all. Yes, the macro is erroneous, but I
> made this mistake in the middle of a much larger macro definition, and
> well..."cdr: () is not a pair" just isn't very informative, although
> now that I know what went wrong I can see how it would arise.
>
> I don't know if this is bad enough to consider a bug, but I did want
> to raise it in hopes of a better tomorrow :)

Thanks!  Logged as ticket #589:
https://trac.ccs.neu.edu/trac/larceny/ticket/589

Will

_______________________________________________
Larceny-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users

Reply via email to