Marco Maggi wrote: > >v0.97b1 is newer and should have fewer bugs. > > Is it also still open to very small non-language > related changes?
Yes. > Fine. But is there a switch that makes larceny print > some non-infinite output in > R6RS-compatible-mode-for-everything-else? No, but there should be. I'm waiting to see what happens with SRFI 38 and SRFI 97. > It would suffice to have a command line switch that > makes the process exit whenever an exception is not > blocked. For what purpose(s) would that suffice? If by "exception" you mean an R6RS exception, then it seems to me you could do that yourself by installing a handler. Furthermore that seems like the only portable way to do it; you can't count on all implementations of the R6RS having exactly the same set of random extensions to the language. Will _______________________________________________ Larceny-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
