I wrote: > The fact that Larceny's binary-port? predicate returns > true for a closed port is a bug, which we will fix.
A more careful search of R6RS library chapter 8 shows that the R6RS allows binary-port? to return true on closed ports, so long as closed ports are neither input ports nor output ports (which Larceny implements correctly). Although the R6RS does not require binary-port? to return false on closed ports, I believe it is confusing for binary-port? to return true on closed ports, so I still consider that to be a bug and still intend to fix it. Will _______________________________________________ Larceny-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
