David (cc'ing larceny-users)- On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:30 AM, David Rush wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Lynn Winebarger <[email protected]> > ... > FWIW, PLT has an undocumented dislike of gcc 4+. Larceny does as > well. I had to make gcc and g++ refer to version 3.4 on cygwin to get > it to compile. Problems with GCC 4 were noted at least at one point in the past... https://trac.ccs.neu.edu/trac/larceny/changeset/2467 However, as noted there, the dislike of GCC 4 was due to poor memory performance on the C code generated by Petit Larceny (especially that for the reader, if my memory serves). It sounds like the problems with gcc 4+ that you two are alluding to are of a different flavor? -Felix _______________________________________________ Larceny-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
