On Jun 4, 2009, at 10:32 AM, David Rush wrote: > This is one of those things where > the explicit use of a continuation function is both conceptually > cleaner and easier to use than the built-in solution
This is self-contradictory. If you believe continuations should take a single value only, then you should apply the same principle to your continuations too. If your continuations take multiple values, then why do you feel icky when built-in continuations do the same? Aziz,,, [with apologies to the original poster who explicitly did intend to start this argument] _______________________________________________ Larceny-users mailing list Larceny-users@lists.ccs.neu.edu https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
