Larceny's let-syntax conforms to the R5RS specification. PLT's let-syntax implements a recommendation made at one of the Scheme workshops some years ago: that let-syntax not introduce a new scope.
The R6RS adopted the semantics implemented by PLT, and it's a bug if Larceny doesn't support that semantics in ERR5RS/R6RS modes. Larceny's R5RS mode still supports the R5RS semantics, however. We can't change that without breaking some old code. I guess we could add an R5RS library that redefines let-syntax, however. Will _______________________________________________ Larceny-users mailing list Larceny-users@lists.ccs.neu.edu https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/larceny-users
