> On Fre, 12 Jul 2002, John B�ckstrand wrote: > >> Perhaps a way to slow down any connection that exceeds a certain size > >> would solve both problems. Any suggestions, pointers or ideas for a > >> better policy are welcome! > > > >WFQ seems to do just this, but in lack of any real > >implementation there is wrr: > > I just tried it, but it didn't seem to work. At least I could not make out > any difference between with or without shaping (same lousy behaviour when > one host started too much traffic). The clases DID receive traffic, as far > as I can tell from a 'tc -s qdisc'. Perhaps I missed something with the > parameters and misconfigured it. :-( > > But I managed to crash my router several times (kernel panik) when using the > wrr-module.
Hmm, Ive been using it a day or so with 2 boxes, no problems at all, though I havent been able to test with different amount of traffic if the weighing really works. Which kernel are you using? Did you ask about your problems on the wrr mailinglist? --- John B�ckstrand _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
