Arindam Haldar wrote:
> hi Alex,
> thanx so much.. :) .. thanx to all
> my IMQ & htb3 test rules are working ok.. the best part--> imq handling
> both in & out traffic now.. :)
I also had this setup, and i also thought of it as a "cool thing" :)
but then Patrick told me, that it's not so clever: the incoming traffic
must pass 2 qdiscs (interface-qdisc and imq-qdisc) and this is bad/not
good because
1) cpu - overhead (but this could be negleted) AND
2) these 2 qdiscs COULD drop packets and no one would know of the other
having dropped s.th. -> retransmit
ok. case 2 is not so realistic, as the qdisc on the interface normaly
is the qfifo but nevertheless point 1) and the possibility of 2) made me
think that queing double unnecessary.
>
> Alexey Talikov wrote:
>
>> Hello Arindam,
>> See imq faq http://luxik.cdi.cz/~patrick/imq/faq.html
>> Saturday, August 10, 2002, 9:46:00 AM, you wrote:
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
