Folke Aeon wrote: > hi, does any body ever met this strange problem? No, I haven't, because I usually don't nest dsmark ;-)
dsmark changes the DS field according to the value in skb->tc_index when the packet _leaves_ the qdisc, and your inner dsmark changes skb->tc_index. I suggest you have a look at figures 6 and 8 (the latter is on page 6) of ftp://icaftp.epfl.ch/pub/linux/diffserv/misc/dsid-01.ps.gz - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina [EMAIL PROTECTED] / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
