Thanks Werner, :)

 i still want to know whether i can mark the
dscp at the ingress qdisc or not , for if i cannot
do this , then at the egress qdisc i still have
no dscp to use . :(




From: Werner Almesberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Folke Aeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Subject: Re: [LARTC] can anyone help me to solve this problem?
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:39:14 -0300

Folke Aeon wrote:
> BUT my trouble is , since i also use have to
> direct all packets into mpls layer , i cannot
> do the dscp marking at the egress . because
> the mpls header is added at the step immediately
> after the packet passes through system routing
> table.

You can explicitly classify on the DSCP, i.e. without using
tcindex. If you need to explicitly skip the MPLS header,
you may use a construct like this:

field mpls_hdr = raw if meta_protocol == ETH_P_MPLS; /* or whatever */
field ip_hdr = mpls_hrd[4]; /* skip shim header */

...
do_whatever if ip_dscp == some_value;
...

> on the packet. i cannot setup proper filter
> based on the index value marked at the ingress.
> thought i still not quite sure whether it is
> because of the mpls header that influences my
> purpose,

That's odd, yes. If MPLS clears skb->tc_index, that would be
a bug.

- Werner

--
_________________________________________________________________________
/ Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

_________________________________________________________________
Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month.� Try MSN! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Reply via email to