> .. snip ..
> >
> > Code: 8b 48 3c 89 d0 03 43 54 39 c1 78 14 39 d1 bf f5 ff ff ff 74
> > <0>Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
> > In interrupt handler - not syncing
> >
>
> Same problem here, until I found that one should (must?) use different
> IMQ devices for PREROUTING and POSTROUTING.
> HTH
Many, many thanks Razvan!!!
It was the problem. I removed one PRE- or POSTROUTING rule and see the
magic: I can't reproduce the kernel panic.
So now the question is:
Is it possible to use the SAME IMQ device for ingress and egress trafffic
(as I tryed to use)? If not, why, and if yes how?
Thank you again,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
