On Wednesday 12 March 2003 22:28, Mugur TOMITA wrote:
> Stef Coene, thank you for your feed-back. I have already read
> docum.org... The tests proved a difference of max 20Kbps between
> theory and real life for cbq.
That's because cbq has to guess the conditions on the link and it uses some
averages. Like packet size.
> In my case practically nobody is limited...
> In my scripts there are classes with prio 8... you say max is 7...
> could this be the problem?
No. If you do
tc -s -d class show dev eth0
you propably see prio 7 for the prio 8 classes.
> Could it be possible that on hard traffic cbq to just let pass
> packets? This is a stupid question I guess...
> Do I have a chance solving the problem by swtching to HTB?
Yes and no :)
htb is easier to understand/implement, there are no obscure options. But if
your problem is setup related, reimplementing the rules in htb can create the
same problem.
Stef
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
