On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Luman wrote:
> I need this solution not only to prioritizing the traffic (prioritizing
> can be achieve in other way) but also to selection the Internet link. I
> want to NAT this low quality data for some specific address in order to
> send it over cheaper link.
I do not know if it might help you, but here's my "temporary hack quality"
solution.
Assumptions:
Determine and mark 'good traffic' -- i.e. smtp, ftp, http, ssh, etc.,
everything which uses well known ports. Probably most people do it
anyway, at least to some level.
All what is left are P2P connections and some other misc connections.
A bit unfair for other protocol using non-standard ports, like Instant
Messenger style-software, and lots of other stuff. So here we introduce
a trick. IMs and other low bandwidth traffic will use small packets
( < 512 or even < 256), P2P will use maximum MTA available (usually
1500, but I've seen some using 576 packets, hence i treat > 512 as P2P).
Probably you've notices that I mention round numbers, as 512 or 1024,
that's because I use u32 for marking packets. How I do it, we leave
as an exercise to the reader. ;-)))
Regards,
Dawid
--
.................. ``The essence of real creativity is a certain
: *Dawid Kuroczko* `. playfulness, a flitting from idea to idea
: q n e [EMAIL PROTECTED] : without getting bogged down by fixated demands.''
`....................' Sherkaner Underhill, A Deepness in the Sky, V. Vinge
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
