On Monday 15 September 2003 23:00, Curtis V. Schleich wrote:
> Trying 4000 right now, I'll try 1500 after I have a chance to see if 4000
> makes any difference. I have put new commands and stats (which I will
> update periodically over the next few hours) at the
> http://wireless.ccaonline.com/lartc/ site. On initial examination it does
> not seem to be making any significant difference. I've still got very
> laggy ping times, which I did not have when we were using CBQ. During the
> HTB research, I did discover that my CBQ setup was probably weird. I had a
> class for each user directly off the root, and the total rates FAR exceeded
> the available bandwidth. So from what I read it was probably pretty
> whacked, but I always seemed to have stable pings under 10ms. These are
> all over the map (or graph as the case may be).
Can put your cbq setup on your web-server? So we can compare....
Stef
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
