Hello,
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Tushar Thakker wrote:
> hi all,
> i am setting up a load balancing netwrok with failover,
> i have applied julian patch,
> but whenever i try to traceroute from any client node, it gives me two entries for
> that destination, but i get different interface for that entries,
> so it doesn't forward my requests,
> i have done masquerading for client nodes,
>
> the ip rule/route are as follows,
>
> ip rule add prio 222 table 222
> ip route add default table 222 proto static \
> nexthop via $GWE1 dev $IFE1 weight 1\
> nexthop via $GWE2 dev $IFE2 weight 1
>
> Now after traceroute failure, if i see the routing cache for that ip, it shows
> following,
output route, probably created from -j MASQUERADE?:
> 205.158.62.141 via 203.88.135.213 dev eth1 src 203.88.135.212
> cache mtu 1500 advmss 1460
input route:
> 205.158.62.141 from 192.168.1.51 via 203.88.135.205 dev eth2 src 192.168.1.242
> cache <src-direct> mtu 1500 advmss 1460 iif eth0
>
> please see eth1 and eth2 in both entries,
Nothing strange so far, may be they are created from different
connections. In fact, there should be more cache entries.
> now it does not forward this request,
Can you provide more information, in private mail if you
prefer so, including:
- tcpdump output(s) for all interfaces during the traceroute
- topology: are eth1 and eth2 connected to same hub?
- ip rules and routes
I hope you really have the "routes" patch applied and
running.
> what can be the reason behind this and please can anyone suggest me the solution,
> thanx in advance,
> Regards,
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Tushar Thakker
> Elitecore Technologies Ltd.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
