Thanks!  Your suggestion didn't exactly work, but it led me to
experiment with the prio statements on the filters too.  Changing them
so they have unique prio statements appears to have fixed the problem.

Thanks again!


-- 
Best regards,
 Scott                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Monday, March 1, 2004, 2:20:36 PM, you wrote:

JA> Hy.

JA> The solution I am going to give you might seem strange, but it worked
JA> with me on a project I'm working and hope to release soon.


JA> Scott Gagon wrote:

>>tc class add dev $TC_DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate ${TC_UPLINK}kbit burst 6k
>>
>># high prio class 1:10:
>>
>>tc class add dev $TC_DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate ${TC_UPLINK}kbit burst 6k 
>>prio 1
>>  
>>
JA> Remove the prio from your class configurations, it seem to cause some
JA> strange problems (at least with me, but i can't use the last htb 
JA> version, mine is 3.1 something, can't check it now).

>>Thanks so much!  I have to say, this has been a learning experience! :\
>>
JA> Hope it helps.

JA> Jos� Ara�jo

JA> _______________________________________________
JA> LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JA> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Reply via email to