> > I suppose the drop you see is CPU bound ? Did you profiled it
> > again ?
>
> No, CPU is about times more in idle state in htb3, and
> 5x lowest data rate. AFAIK, htb3 scheduler is faster, so that is the
> reason of moving to htb3.

ok then it is config issue probably. you should pin it down
to smallest possible number of classes for test (say up to
5 classes) and then use tc -s show class ... to see internal
statistics. Look for classes with small (or negative)
tokens or ctokens - these are in throttling state and are
slowing throughtput - then think if it is ok ..

>From data you send one can't decide what's bad. In any case
and as I said before, behavioue changed a bit so that results
can be a bit different a may need tc script changes.

devik

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Reply via email to