Hi,All
        I am using iproute2 to manage bandwith for ADSL router.High,medium,low 
priority are needed for different protocol port on the ADSL's upstream side,as 
following:
        LAN --- |ADSL Router|------WAN
   When there aren't traffic on the specific priority, its bandwidth should be 
borrowed by other priorities.But it doesn't work.Here is my script:

        /usr/sbin/tc qdisc del dev nas0 root
        /usr/sbin/tc qdisc del dev br0 root
        /usr/sbin/tc qdisc add dev nas0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 1024kbit avpkt 
1000 cell 8
        /usr/sbin/tc class add dev nas0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq bandwidth 1024kbit 
rate 1024kbit weight 1024kbit prio 0 allot 1514 cell 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 isolated 
bounded
        /usr/sbin/tc class add dev nas0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 cbq bandwidth 1024kbit 
rate 611kbit weight 611kbit prio 1 allot 1514 cell 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 
        /usr/sbin/tc class add dev nas0 parent 1:1 classid 1:3 cbq bandwidth 1024kbit 
rate 305kbit weight 305kbit prio 3 allot 1514 cell 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000
        /usr/sbin/tc class add dev nas0 parent 1:1 classid 1:4 cbq bandwidth 1024kbit 
rate 103kbit weight 103kbit prio 5 allot 1514 cell 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 
        /usr/sbin/tc class add dev nas0 parent 1:1 classid 1:5 cbq bandwidth 1024kbit 
rate 5kbit weight 5kbit prio 8 allot 1514 cell 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000

        class 1:1 is root class;class 1:2 is for high priority;class 1:3 is for  
medium priority,class 1:4 is for low priority,class 1:5 is for other traffic.When I 
use "bounded" in subclass 1:2,1:3,1:4,1:5,each rate can be assured in each class,but 
can't borrow.When I use "isolated" in every subclass,the result isn't expected.
        How should I do for "when no traffic on the specific priority,its bandwidth 
can be borrowed by other traffic"? Thank you very much!                                
                 

  Regards.
                                

                                                                                 
                                           swcims
                                                                                
                                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                                                              
                                          2004-05-25

Reply via email to