> Ludek Horak wrote: > > > What do you think about this configuration? Do you know better setting for > > gaming traffic on share connection line? I'd like to know your opinions. > > I'm appreciating your comments. > > I wouldn't send interactive type traffic to sfq - perturb causes packet > reordering, it's meant for bulk traffic really. > > Are the 2/2 and 4/4 internet link - you are OK for bandwidth on wireless? > > Andy.
Would you be more specific? I understand that sfq is not the best. Should I create interactive class with pfifo queue discipline and what about parent class? Leave it sfq? Our bandwith is fine and 2/2 is guaranteed internet link. Thx in advance _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
