On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:02:42 +0100
Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Edward Smith wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I am running a coop satellite link for my aviation company here in
> > Iraq. (silly blog www.stardotstar.org). I am running tc with htb
> > with good success so far. I am working on improving it though and
> > need some help. Currently I have just 4 classes, syn/ack/ping,
> > webchat, http, and then other. We are really happy with how this has
> > improved our ability to call home from our rooms and do video chat.
> > However, I would like to do a better job of making sure that each
> > IP is getting a fair share because it seems like sometimes one video
> > or audio chat bullies another one into slowing down and one guy is
> > having a great video and audio feed while someone elses audio only is
> > suffering. I've seen some references to wrr and also to making a
> > class for each IP. There doesn't seem to be much current documention
> > on wrr, so I'm trying to set up nested htbs. Here are my questions:
> >
> > 1. Which makes more sense, to nest my 4 classes of traffic inside of a
> > class for each IP, or to make a class for each IP in each of my 4
> > classes. I'm leaning towards the latter so that someones web traffic
> > can't borrow from the interactive traffic classes.
>
> I would do the latter also. I would have just one interactive class and
> give it a rate that is say 3/4 of the ceil, the bulk classes can still
> borrow the unused.
> >
> > 2. I've done a test, and can't get any traffic into the nested
> > classes. Here is my code:
> >
> > #1:20 LOW DELAY--CHAT DATA
> > #includes the minimize delay FW TOS
> > tc class add dev ${UPDEV} parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 200kbit
> > ceil ${UPCEIL}kbit burst 6k prio 1
> > tc filter add dev ${UPDEV} protocol ip parent 1: pref 20 u32\
> > match ip tos 0x10 0xff flowid 1:20
> > tc filter add dev ${UPDEV} protocol ip parent 1: pref 21 handle 5 fw
> > classid 1:20
> > tc filter add dev ${UPDEV} protocol ip parent 1: pref 21 handle 6 fw
> > classid 1:20
>
so marking is thing that i need for limiting NATed uploads to internet ?
when limiting downloads i do not need marking ?
am i right ?
--
*Dariusz 'tdi' Dwornikowski | Gentoo | admin at pozman.pl |
*[JID]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[gg]:2266034|[IRC]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
*[MAIL]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[WWW]:www.tdi.pozman.pl |
*Serwery,administracja,webapps - www.ProAdmin.com.pl |
*Fingerprint:43E21CC46DAFD2F754E91547D59B39F56AAA4B5F |
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
