Corey Hickey wrote:
>
> I still maintain ESFQ; the latest version is at:
> http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/
>
> This would be an appropriate time to ask:
> Does anybody have any fixes for or improvements to ESFQ that I don't
> know about? My patch doesn't have anything revolutionary -- I've been
> merely keeping Alexander Clouter's 2.6 port in sync with the upstream
> changes to SFQ.
>
> -Corey
1) I'd like for your code to support kernel version 2.4! It is crazy
that there are two branches of ESFQ.
2) ESFQ should be able to match a firewall mark, dport and sport. All
except CLASSIC should understand NOT ("! sport 22").
3) The documentation should be improved.
--
gypsy
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
