Hi,
Please someone tell me what is the best in terms of performance when I
use one class per client or one class per package I am new to it and dont
know how the details. I am getting trouble sometimes when I connect from LAN
to server through SSH(putty), the connection starts to hang and speed goes
down. I dont know what configuration is wrong in cbq. Previously i was using
squid delay pools.
Regards,
Arman
On 5/26/07, Arman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone in this mailing list answer a few theoretical question which r
confusing me.
Here is the scenario
I have a total Bandwidth of 2Mbps for a private LAN I am managing. I am
using cbq standard script available online and for controlling bandwidth,
squid and iptables. I have diff. packages for client.
One: server own services access (unlimited bandwidth means no delays or
control) + A Internet bandwidth
Two: server own services (unlimited) + B Internet bandwidth
Three: server own services (unlimited) + C Internet bandwidth
Now I have to distribute speed between these clients, which are around
120. If I calculate I should have over 4Mbps total bandwidth. Currently I am
using cbq for controlling bandwidth and have 120 cbq classes, one class per
user. Is this good or I should have 4 categories of classes and users
sharing the speed. Currently I figure out that in diff times of day
bandwidth utilization is diff. sometimes users utilizing low bandwidth and
most of bandwidth is wasted and sometimes scenario is diff.
What will be the case if I switch to htb. I thought I could utilize ceil
parameter to utilize wasted bandwidth in current configuration like one
class per user.
Please suggest the optimal solution.
Thnax is advance
--
Regards,
M Arman
--
Regards,
Arman
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
