Hello, Can you post the scripts you are using ?
On 7/2/07, Edouard Thuleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, I know the older version of this diagram and this one is quite the same I told below but the problem is the same for the DNAT. I made another test. I change the DSCP value in the PREROUTING table and I put an ingress policing which match this new dscp value but the filter doesn't match nothing (I work on a Linux 2.6.17). With my test, the older version (http://www.imagestream.com/~josh/PacketFlow.jpg<http://www.imagestream.com/%7Ejosh/PacketFlow.jpg>) of the diagram seams more exactly. Have you an idea ? 2007/7/2, nano bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >: > > Hello, > > I find this one more useful : > > http://www.imagestream.com/~josh/PacketFlow-new.png<http://www.imagestream.com/%7Ejosh/PacketFlow-new.png> > > On 7/2/07, Edouard Thuleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I find this diagram which details the kernel packet traveling : > > http://www.docum.org/docum.org/kptd/ > > Is it up to date ? > > I made some test and I put a DNAT rules in the PREROUTING table of an > > interface and I attach it a ingress policy, the dst IP wasn't changed. the > > DNAT it isn't yet make. > > > > I've another question (I'm not sure is it the good mailing list), for > > the fragment packet, I see the ingress policy doesn't work correctly and I'd > > like to know where in the kernel travel of the packet the fragment are > > re-assemble ? At the NAT or in the routing ? > > > > Thanks, > > Edouard. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LARTC mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc > > > > >
_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
