On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:47:38 +0200
DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tested this and having a cpufreq that slows down the CPU
> affects the rate of HTB. My ondemand cpufreq governor scales down the
> CPU frequency about 40% and this is more or less the slowdown the rate
> suffers, 40%.
This is expected behaviour when CONFIG_NET_SCH_CLK_CPU is defined:
Say Y here if you want to use the CPU's cycle counter as clock
source.
This is a cheap and high resolution clock source, but on some
architectures it is not synchronized on all processors
and doesn't handle cpu clock frequency changes.
> Any known way of dealing with this without having to disable
> cpufreq?
Yes, specify a different clock source in your kernel configuration.
--atj
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
