Interrompo subito il mio silenzio perche' ho parlato di SECTOR a un
amico  anglofono ma residente a roma e rivisto al no-border (che si e'
anche iscritto alla lista laser: ciao A.!) che lo ha addirittura
tradotto in inglese per maggior portabilita'. 
Ora siamo tutti in vacanza (piu' o meno, io  no), ma a breve mi
piacerebbe avere le idee piu' chiare su chi potrebbe essere interessato
dentro LASER a proporre simili idee.
SECTOR e' solo un "manifesto", un "draft" ed e' pure riduttivo, va
stropicciato e spiegazzato secondo le esigenze ci chi ci mette mani e
piedi dentro. 

ciao

a

****

Intro
1. We want technological innovation to take place without patents and 
in a 'free' environment'. As usual, the model is that of copyleft and 
free software. But there's a problem: whilst copyright can be adapted 
to become copyleft, patents cannot become anti-patents with the same 
ease because:

- to patent an invention is not free of cost, whereas with Copyright is
- to patent an invention one has to make an application, whilst 
copyright is a natural right. Basically, anyone who wishes to patent in 
an alternative way has to spend a ton of money and deal with a mass of 
bureaucracy such that an alternative patent is (today) unfeasible.

Two Possible Solutions

2.1 To find a legal instrument to hijack patents: if only Lescai, 
Sterpo and I think about it we won't get too far. But perhaps if a 
range of minds begin to think about it then perhaps something more can 
emerge.

2.2 A public institution such as the EU could 'finance' innovation 
unfastened from patents, investing in a public and horizontal 
circulation of knowledge (which produces innovation through 
cooperation) rather than through a market in knowledge (that produces 
innovation by means of competition for profit).
'
3. The S.E.C.T.O.R. Project (No Limits)
S.E.C.T.O.R.= European Space of Horizontal Technological Cooperation

One could propose to the EU the financing of a multidisciplinary 
research project (SECTOR, exactly) aimed at finding a new model of 
Technology Transfer" (NB, TT is the means by which ideas are 
transformed into technology available to society'). For example, 
patents drive an inventor to invent and a business to know of the 
invention and make a product out of it) adopting solution 2.1 or 2.2

Obviously, Laser on its own can't get bugger all financed by the EU on 
its own. The idea is rather that Laser proposes this idea to different 
subjects, specialized in various areas, each one in their own sector, 
who can contribute to the research project.

Laser would function as the connective tissue of these subjects, 
capable of convening them and bringing them into contact with each 
other. The each one could decide to invest some of their resources in 
the project.
e.g. If A. B. (vice-director of the CNEL) supports the idea, he'd 
receive the funds from the EU and pay a young researcher to work on it.

4. The Research project of Sector

Research has hypothesis and Objectives

4.1 The Hypothesis
The EU wants to bridge the innovation gap with respect to the US and 
Japan (and soon with China and india).

4.1.2 Europe is chasing the US in R&D in a rough way; they finance only 
research in which the business sector have already manifested 
commercial interest or which can be certain of producing patents. But 
the EU has become more realist than the king: today the US finances far 
more basic research in comparison with the EU (eg also for military 
purposes and not only out of love for knowledge)

4.1.3 The gap between the US and EU is not diminishing but the contrary.

4.1.4 The Eu, especially with the entry of the eastern countries, has a 
possibility of circulating knowledge  that the US does not have, but 
its not exploited by more dynamic capitalism, which uses informal 
networks only to trade ham produced in Parma
and sold in Berlin. Technological innovation is following old models 
(investments by big business) or those apparently but not really 'new'.

4.2 The Objectives of SECTOR

To equip the EU with the instruments to make Europe an Open Source 
space in which the knowledge of R & D circulate freely and produce 
innovation in an alternative way with respect to the US, following the 
path set out in 2.1 or 2.2. Here are the steps involved:

4.2.1 Show that the EU-US gap (from various points of view) is widening 
despite European science being ever more commercial and 'americanised'.

Needed: an economist

4.2.2 Do a feasibility study of counter-patents: the observations made 
in point 1 occurred to us in 5 minutes but perhaps these things could 
be gone into in more depth.

Needed: Sociologist of Science, a lawyer or an economist

4.2.3 If an anti-patent should be feasible, to write a legal draft (a 
sort of GPL) as needed.

Needed: lawyer

4,2,4, Show that in Europe development unhindered by patents is 
possible and desirable and that the EU should invest in its creation 
(for example by adopting a 'free' policy in the newly born European 
Patent Office.

Needed: an economist

4.2.5. Show that information is worth more if it circulates more 
quickly and more openly.

Needed: a journalist

4.2.6. Show that for a sharp business, 'free' style development can 
make sense.

Needed: an entrepreneur who is already operating without patents (linux 
Distributions), an entrepreneur who would work thus (computing/services)

4.2.7. Outline the concrete strategic policies that the EU could adopt 
to become a 'free R&D' space.

Needed: economist

4.2.8. Produce technological instruments that facilitate the diffusion 
of free innovation: e.g. a p2p software for knowledge, a web site etc.

Needed: programmers

------------------------------



On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 02:15 PM, pwd9148 wrote:

> Ciao Alan,
>
> how was the end of the NoBorder camp? I was there too shortly, it is 
> sad
> because i like very much that region.
> During my stay in Salento we discussed about Bio-GPL and i mentioned a
> research draft we were working on as LASER (www.e-laser.org). It was 
> circulated on our
> mailing list, therefore i send you just the link to the message in our 
> public mailing list
> archive:
>
> https://www.inventati.org/mailman/public/laser/2003-June/000626.html
>
> It is not a formal document, but just a summary of ideas collected and 
> put in
> order. If you are interested in it, want to suggest changes or make 
> critics
> on it, write to me or to
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Have a nice reading
>
> Andrea
>
> --
> ciao
>
> pwd9148
>
_______________________________________________
www.e-laser.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Rispondere a