On Nov 28, Jim Grandy wrote: > I've filed a bug (LPP-1068) on this, with a sub-task to minimally address the > documentation issue by updating the RefGuide. The right fix would be to change > "subviews" to "subnodes" in the first line of code (and remove the NB > comment), but that's likely to break code that assumes searchSubnodes behaves > the same as searchSubviews. I have no idea how much code like that is out in > the wild. There is some in our sources -- 8 places in our .lzx code that I > see, and in the implementation of LzNode.determinePlacement. (By the way, > isn't it weird that LzNode.determinePlacement relies on an attribute > (subviews) that is only declared in a subclass, LzView?)
uh, oops. I think you could change this and add a relnote. It's a pretty good indicator that if you change this and none of our apps breaks (demos + mail and maybe a studios app for good measure) then it's safe. A _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
