actually tried it, but it is documented in the Macromedia docs.
On 12/2/05, Cortlandt Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Guys,
I might be missing something here, but I'm thinking that even if it's not the case today, the tag might be usefull in a couple of ways down the road that fits well with the laszlo way of doing things such as to have a declarative way of styling of initial text.
<LzTextFormat name="joe" bold="true" italics="false" ... etc />
<richinputtext name="rich" width="300" height="100" multiline="true" textFormat="joe">
"Use setTextFormat to set several formatting attributes at once declaratively."
</richinputtext>
Or as a way of declarativly styling sections of text. (There could be some mistakes in this example when it comes to what the syntax of this should look like, I'm just thinking out loud)
<textstyle name="regular" bold="true" underlined="false" color="..etc />
<textstyle name="underlined" bold="true" underlined="false"...etc />
<richinputtext name="rich" width="300" height="100" multiline="true">
<LzTextFormat textstyle="regular">Use setTextFormat to set</LzTextFormat>
<LzTextFormat textstyle="underlined">several</LzTextFormat>
<LzTextFormat textstyle="regular">formatting attributes at once."></LzTextFormat>
</richinputtext>
Somthing like this will probably be the goal especially when css is implemented, won't it? I'm also thinking that having that tag has the potential to make it easier to protect users from Flash's underlying textformat quirks and gives the programmer more control over individual nodes in order to handle crazy things like the align handling than embedding font tag text into a string.
Just thinking out loud.
Thanks for everything you are doing, I hope to check out the current version more closely soon.
-Cort
On 12/2/05, John Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:D'oh!
Actually, although that's an obvious point, it never occured to me.
I'll make sure it's made more clear in the documentation. Actually the
Developer's Guide doesn't even have a full chapter on scripting (it
merely has a short tutorial). I guess it's about time I wrote one.
jrs
PS: I like your idea about alllowing the .js suffix.
On Dec 1, 2005, at 4:51 PM, P T Withington wrote:
>>
>
> If it is meant to only be used in script, then it should be defined in
> script. Then you won't get the magic parallel tag interface.
>
> <script>
> function LzTextFormat () {
> ...
> }
> </script>
>
> Perhaps we should also allow files consisting solely of script to have
> a .js suffix, but I don't think that is required to solve this issue.
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
