Since we decided to pass kernels through as-is, do we need this partial change? Approved [ as an interim step to full swf support - may want to hold until there's full swf support]
-Max P T Withington wrote: > Note this does not implement the in operator in SWF (yet), just lets it > pass through to DHTML. So you should only use it in the kernel, not in > generic code. > > Waiting for my reviewers to approve... > > On 2006-03-21 13:54 EST, Adam Wolff wrote: > >> go tucker! >> >> On Mar 21, P T Withington wrote: >> >>> Change 39847 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2006/02/28 12:47:39 *pending* >>> >>> Summary: Parse `a in b` >>> Bugs Fixed: >>> LPP-969 "Implement 'in' operator" (partial) >>> Technical Reviewer: hminsky (pending) >>> QA Reviewer: max (pending) >>> Doc Reviewer: n/a (pending) >>> Details: Use a hack to avoid duplicating every production just >>> so you can disambiguate `for (... in` from `... in ...`. This >>> is sufficient for the Javascript translator. The SWF backend >>> still needs to be taught to translate the `in` operator. >>> Tests: ./buildlfc no longer barfs on use of `in` in >>> lzdataset.js >>> >>> Affected files ... >>> >>> ... >>> //depot/lps-legals/WEB-INF/lps/server/sc/src/org/openlaszlo/sc/Parser.jjt#2 >>> >>> edit >>> >>> > > -- Regards, Max Carlson OpenLaszlo.org _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
