> I understand that you are just fixing a bug and not incorporating any new functionality, but I thought this an opportune moment to get you to look at the docs :^)
I don't know what keywords should be private and which should be public; that's why I would like you to take a look. If you look at the reference page for this class, it appears pretty much useless, as there are no methods on it. When you look in the source, however, you see lots of methods on it. I just want to make sure that the docs are correct. Maybe there is a good reason that all those methods are private -- I'm not in a good position to judge that. If, after taking a look, you think they should all remain private, then I'll approve the checkin as is. In fact, I pre-approve, on the understanding that you'll take a look and make public any methods (n >= 0) that should be made public. Thanks jrs > > This patch doesn't expose any new functionality, just fixes a bug. But > I can > change any private keywords to public if they are supposed to be. > Which vars > or functions are you referring to? _______________________________________________ Laszlo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
