On May 7, 2006, at 5:47 PM, P T Withington wrote:

> Looks good, but what is 'hasAttribute'?  Do you mean  
> hasOwnProperty?  (Or 'in', but we don't permit 'in').
>
> The idiom we use for testing the existence of a property without  
> getting a warning is this['prop'] -- the debugger does not warn on  
> that.

I'd been doing that on Emerald, and then Adam Wolff said something  
disparaging about that idiom. Is hasOwnProperty the right way to do  
it? Mr Wolff, do you remember your preferred idiom for checking for  
this case without a debugger warning?

I picked up hasAttribute from dojo, and (upon research) it seems to  
be a DOM thing.

I will change to hasOwnProperty.

>
> But perhaps we should be working on ERROR's first, not WARNING's.   
> It is not an error in Javascript to reference a non-existent  
> property, we only have a warning to help people debug.  Maybe I  
> should make that warning optional.

Stupid linux tricks, aka, ben just learned how to use cut:
  grep CLIENT_LOG work/logs/lps.log | grep ERROR | cut --delimiter="  
" -f13 | sort | uniq | wc -l
tells me that my particular log (which was just one run of lztest/ 
lztest-simple.lzx)
has 85 unique errors

  grep CLIENT_LOG work/logs/lps.log | grep WARNING | cut -- 
delimiter=" " -f13 | sort | uniq | wc -l
reveals 165 unique warnings

grep CLIENT_LOG work/logs/lps.log | grep WARNING | cut --delimiter="  
" -f13 | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u
reveals warnings from 18 files

and errors from only 13:
grep CLIENT_LOG work/logs/lps.log | grep ERROR | cut --delimiter=" " - 
f13 | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | wc -l

...which, in case you were wondering, is
core/LzClass.as
core/LzNode.as
core/UserClass.as
data/LzDataText.lzs
glue/LaszloInitiator.as
services/LzFocus.as
services/LzFontManager.as
services/LzInstantiator.as
services/LzKeys.as
services/LzModeManager.as
views/LaszloCanvas.as
views/LaszloView.as
views/LzText6.as



>
> On 2006-05-07, at 17:56 EDT, Benjamin Shine wrote:
>
>>
>> Tucker, I have risen to approximately 1% of your challenge. If  
>> these fixes are in the right vein, I'll keep going.
>>
>> Change 42100 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2006/05/07 14:49:36  
>> *pending*
>>
>>      Summary: Eliminating a few warnings in LaszloCanvas.as  
>> instantiation.
>>      
>>      New Features:
>>      
>>      Bugs Fixed:
>>      
>>      Technical Reviewer: ptw (pending)
>>      QA Reviewer:  frisco (pending)
>>      Doc Reviewer:  (pending)
>>      
>>      Documentation:
>>      
>>      Release Notes:
>>      
>>      Details:
>>         This change eliminates the following runtime errors and  
>> warnings, when I run http://localhost:8087/lps-legals/test/lztest/ 
>> lztest-simple.lzx?debug=true
>>         07 May 2006 14:21:26 (127.0.0.1 2) INFO   
>> responders.ResponderEVAL – CLIENT_LOG ERROR: views/LaszloCanvas.as: 
>> 256: undefined object does not have a property ‘sendEvent’
>>         07 May 2006 14:21:26 (127.0.0.1 1) INFO  
>> responders.ResponderEVAL – CLIENT_LOG WARNING: views/ 
>> LaszloCanvas.as:256: reference to undefined property  
>> ‘onpercentcreated’
>>         07 May 2006 14:21:26 (127.0.0.1 3) INFO  
>> responders.ResponderEVAL – CLIENT_LOG WARNING: views/ 
>> LaszloCanvas.as:258: reference to undefined property ‘initdelay’
>>         07 May 2006 14:21:26 (127.0.0.1 4) INFO  
>> responders.ResponderEVAL – CLIENT_LOG WARNING: views/ 
>> LaszloCanvas.as:308: reference to undefined property ’LZlateinit’
>>      
>>      Tests:
>>
>> Affected files ...
>>
>> ... //depot/lps-legals/WEB-INF/lps/lfc/core/LzNode.as#7 edit
>> ... //depot/lps-legals/WEB-INF/lps/lfc/views/LaszloCanvas.as#5 edit
>> ... //depot/lps-legals/lps/utils/lztestmanager.lzx#2 edit
>>
>>
>> <changeset-42100.zip>
>>
>> benjamin shine
>> software engineer
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>

benjamin shine
software engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev

Reply via email to